This week we had the pleasure of reading and discussing an interesting conference article written by Waller Hastings on Disney’s movie Pocahontas. The movie was under controversial criticism by many critics arguing it being a positive or negative portrayal of American history and Native American.
Hasting argues in the article that although Disney claimed Pocahontas is its first historically
accurate film, there exists a lot of transformation and distortion that
contradict Disney’s claims. It is important for audiences to understand these
differences and the power of Disney.
Hastings is able to create strong arguments in his writing,
including finding contradictions in Disney’s claims. For example, the
exaggeration in visual scenery and changes in main characters’ ages are the
opposite of Disney’s “research” of Virginia and characters’ in the history.
In fact, Hasting believes that the story of Pocahontas has
become a legendary tale that has multiple versions of story instead of factual
depictions of historical events. Disney’s effort in portraying the event as “correctly”
as possible is itself an inefficient approach. Furthermore, Disney emphasis on
their effort of truthfulness, though genuine, is laughable for many critics.
When the motivation of a company is to create entertainment
and make money, accuracy is not part of audiences’ expectation and that is why
Disney was able to escape many criticism by setting the background story of a
movie to “ a kingdom far away”. However, Disney entered a dangerous realm when
it tried to create extra attraction for consumers who care for history. In that
case it will be the parents who want their children to get educational benefit.
The motives behind Disney for the creation of Pocahontas can be diverse: make the
movie more educational, create racial equality…etc In the end, children will
not remember the history but only the Pocahontas
Disney presented to them. As many critics claims, Disney has the responsibility
to be educational and accurate, I doubt it will ever be part of the standard in
film industry. Externality, or side-effects, created by Disney’s films on
children can be influential but in the current system there is no way of
quantifying the influence nor judging the minor mistakes Disney has made in its
movie.
After all, Disney is doing its best to attract customers to
buy its product. Although the majority of consumers in late 20th
century might be white population, as the income gap decreases Disney will
concern more for critics’ claim and others raising ethical group consumers. It
is a sad way to put it, but in the business world, the so called “moral high ground’
is not always advantageous.
Thus, Disney, critics and consumers all play roles in
social progression. Folks in Disney are part of society and if the society is
racially biased, how can people in them not be? To ask Disney to change is to
ask society to change. The problem is that younger children who are watching
Disney movies might not understand the underlying messages in them, and the
traditional biased trend can carry for a while in media and it is our job to
correct the trends and create progress.
No comments:
Post a Comment